Blog #2-Mark Lampert
Art is a very interesting part of
society. Not only is it a form of expression, but also an important public
forum, allowing us to convey something that simply talking about wouldn’t do
justice for. Art has many uses, including entertainment, expression, pleasure,
and many more. However, in my opinion, art is most useful when applied as a
social critique. Art allows the unique opportunity to express how someone is
feeling about the world and shape it into something that is meaningful to him
or her. Later generations can then use art as a record of history, to explain
the time period that the artist lived in and how they felt about it.
This is important because of the
current problems facing our country today, like the economy, social inequality,
racial tension, and the war in Iraq, to name a few. Artists are needed to
express how things really are, to give their opinions on the state of the
world, and to influence change. Popular artists in the music world have large
fan bases, and can get their message out to large numbers of people through the
Internet. With their popularity, they can create real change, and are often
loved by the people, something the government today currently lacks.
This leads into what I want to talk
about today, a 2011 song by the artist Lupe Fiasco, called “Words I Never
Said.” A popular song reaching the top
50 in iTunes, it is an entertaining hip-hop style song with clear messages
about economic inequality and government conspiracy. Specifically, the
words “Keep you at the
bottom but tease you with the upper crust, you get it then they move it so you
never keeping up enough” references the fact that many American families are
struggling to even keep up with the middle class income, and when they make it
there, the boundary is pushed up again. Another line “our
child’s future was the first to go with budget cuts,” references the fact that education funding was severely cut by the
government, sacrificing children’s education. These social critiques are in a
song, which is a form of art, but just as important for society to hear than a
politician giving a speech, and a much more entertaining forum.
This song represents
the discontentment of American citizens with how things are being run, and
influenced the occupy movement, which started last year in New York City,
protesting against economic inequality. This song was not the sole reason for
the movement, and I am not claiming that, but it was one of many reasons that
change occurred and ensuring the status quo did not continue. That is why art
as social critique is so important, so that we can realize what we as a society
are unhappy with and try to fix it. If we never realize those problems, we
can’t ever fix them. Art is everywhere, not only in museums like some people
would believe. It can be dangerous, however, when the wrong message is sent
out, like in some forms of music. That is why it is so important to make sure
you realize what something is truly saying before you listen to it, and realize
it may solely be a form of entertainment. Art can lead to change, but we want
to ensure that it is a positive form of change first. It does beg the question:
Where is the line between art as a critique and art as entertainment?
I still am not convinced that art (like this song) has really any influence on social change or actually does anything besides deliver a message and entertain. I think that art as critique and entertainment can really go hand in hand and their isn't necessarily a line between the two. granted some songs are strictly entertainment and others strictly to make a point.
ReplyDeleteI don't think it's at all possible to distinguish the line between art as social critique and art as entertainment; the two kind of work hand-in-hand, as Jordan pointed out. With social critique comes some entertainment, and with some entertainment, there's bound to be some social critique.
ReplyDeleteI think art has a certain amount of influence on social change and it depends on the audience to relate it and draw parallels to reality. As Laksh and Jordan commented I too think that entertainment is somehow laced with social critique and one cannot be without the other.
ReplyDelete