Personally, when I go and research a new book, I will often
look at the customer reviews to see what other people have to say about it.
After all, these should be people who have read the book and be informed on it,
and I want to see whether it will be worth my time. However, I am now realizing
that there is a big flaw to this approach. Not only am I seeking the approval
of strangers, but I am also basing whether or not I will read a book off of
these reviews. If a book was critically acclaimed by the general public, or
given “5 stars” I am more likely to see the book as a quality work and read it.
However, if it has “3 stars” or fewer, I will often wonder why that is and be
less inclined to read the book. I think this approach is a flawed one because
we are essentially basing our opinions of literature on strangers we don’t
know, who may or may not be educated on what good literature contains, and in
the process conforming to what society favors. A book may have a bad rating on
Amazon, Barnes and Noble, or any other online review service, but still be
quality literature. The reasons it has a bad rating may be because it talks
about a subject that society doesn’t like to talk about, or has a different
view on touchy subjects like politics, religion, etc. That doesn’t mean that
book isn’t worth reading or worth your time, simply because it isn’t rated
highly by society or because it doesn’t conform to popular culture. Have you
ever turned away from a book simply because it was given a poor rating
online?
However, reviews do provide a good
sense of whether an author has a strong fan base, and a strong fan base usually
means that the author is a good one. For instance, JK Rowling has an average
review of 4.5/5 stars on Amazon, and she is known for a strong fan base (with
me as a part of that). They also serve
the purpose of giving the public a forum to share thoughts on the book, what
they liked and disliked, and see what others thought on the book, perhaps
leading to discussion and a sense of community. On the other hand, Amazon and
sites like it take advantage of reviews to encourage sales. If it’s a “5 star”
book, it can be advertised as a “must read” because others liked it, and that
will probably encourage sales. Most people who read a book won’t write a review
on it, as there are about 3000 reviews for Harry Potter and the Deathly
Hallows, and I know that particular novel sold millions of copies. That says a
lot about who we are as a society, as most people choose not to post a review,
because it demonstrates that most of us simply don’t want to write one. For me
personally, after I read a book, I might tell my friends or family about it if
they ask, but I don’t have interest in writing an online review. I want others
to form their own opinions on the book first without seeing what I have to say
about it, as I believe that is how we grow as people. Any piece of literature
doesn’t have as large an impact if you know what to expect, and I don’t want to
ruin that for anyone. Have you ever written a review?
I personally have never written a review for a book, but I have rated books before. On a website called GoodReads, based on what you rate books you've read, it suggests more books for you to read, and I've started using this website very recently.
ReplyDeletei have never considered reading books as it is, but i would say that i probably do place to much stock in what random people say about other things like movies and have been turned away from those.
ReplyDeletePersonally, I do read the reviews on books before I actually them, I guess its true that the method is flawed but I think it is pretty effective at weeding out books that are from genres that I am not interested in.
ReplyDelete